April 19, 2008
How Lost lost me
The love affair is over. After watching the first two seasons, I’ve decided that the Lost TV show is not for me. I don’t think I will be watching it anymore.
You are probably asking why? Lost is so awesome!
Well, I disagree.
First, some background. My wife and I do not subscribe to cable service, nor do we watch network TV over broadcast. We hated wasting time with commercials, and since Netflix and Blockbuster carry TV shows in their repertoire, we ended up saving money and time. My extended family became big Lost fans, so when they purchased the seasons on DVD, I was able to borrow them for free.
Now onto my reasons why Lost has lost me as a viewer. (Don‘t think I made this decision lightly because it cost me nothing, I did like Lost very much in the beginning, and I made it through two whole seasons after all.)
I enjoyed Lost a lot when it was the story of people stuck on an abandoned island, forced to forage in order to survive. But even in the first season, this Robinson Crusoe style need to survive wasn’t enough for the producers and writers. So they added in the strange happenings on the island. Okay, that was pretty cool, especially with all the strange noises and the weird thing with the polar bear. That was fascinating stuff and added a great air of mystery to the whole show.
But I’m a little off track, so let’s return. I liked the idea of the people having to survive on a deserted island. Robinson Crusoe is one of all my all time favorite books, alongside The Count of Monte Cristo. Lost glosses over this. Think back to when you watched it the first time. Do you remember the people really having to work hard to find food? Oh, I know, it was mentioned, and Locke did some hunting, but he always managed to come back with food. In all, I just felt that the basics of survival (food, clothing, shelter) and the struggle to get them was glossed over and made much too easy for the characters.
Second Reason. To be honest, this long, dragged out questions about the nature of the island and the various groups living on it has simply gotten annoying. There are too many questions without answers, and when more questions get piled on top, you lose track of the original questions. This is an annoyance for me. Obviously there is a reason behind what the directors and writers are doing, but I don’t want to go through the hassle of getting there. Sorry, it is too much. The air of mystery is wearing thin, and honestly, it is time to give it a bit more oxygen.
Finally, the characters are becoming less and less interesting. They are not growing or changing in any significant way, and to me they are becoming less and less three-dimensional and more and more caricatures. (Yes, even with the flashbacks.) It can be argued that people like Sawyer, Jack, Charlie, and Locke have all been changed in significant ways (for better or worse), and there is a valid argument. But honestly, even after two seasons, I’m still not convinced that if these people were dropped back into their real lives that they would act differently. I think that they are simply acting as circumstances dictate. Compelling characters require real, substantive change and Lost just doesn’t have that, at least not yet.
Feel free to disagree with my position. I am open to being convinced to go back and watch Season 3. My brother has lent it to me and my wife (who really wants to watch it, but to whom I have said feel free to do so without me, something she is unlikely to do. If she asks, I will watch it with her though, but she hasn’t asked) so I could watch it at any time.
At this point, though, I just feel that I would be better entertained by a good book, Law and Order reruns, or some other TV show. (Perhaps Battlestar Galactica or The Sarah Connor Chronicles?)
Share:
Hey Otter,
We gave up, too. But then we came back. Some friends convinced us that the slump ends and the characters and plot truly do get better. I would encourage you to stick with it. We watch on Netflix. Here is an interesting post I found today (it contains a ton of spoilers if you haven't watched the current season). I do think there is more than meets the eye and plenty of fun for analysis and entertainment:
http://www.semicolonblog.com/?p=2454
John,
It isnt a scf-fi series, but if you are looking for an excellent tv series to check out on dvd...get the first season of Friday Night Lights and be prepared to lose your entire weekend watching it.
Posted by: Jeff C on April 18, 2008 02:27 PMSay it ain't so!!! I love LOST. It has gotten better. You got to stick with it!!!
But if you are determined not to, then certainly I would recommend Battlestar Galactica as well - very clever and stylish.
Posted by: Bill Reichart on April 18, 2008 03:31 PMStill not quite convinced....
Posted by: John on April 20, 2008 06:55 PMJohn,
I can certainly understand why, after season 2, you would think LOST is/was a show going nowhere. And even for the first 6 episodes of season 3 the feeling persists. Then something funny happened.
ABC and the producers of LOST actually agreed that the show had to have an endpoint so that the fans could start getting answers to the questions that were raised. And so now, with a definite end in sight (2010, the year we make contact), the show has started illuminating more of the mysteries. They haven't out and out stated what is going on, but we are getting a lot more clues and intimations. We're also getting a lot more really good character development to boot.
If you can, I'd watch season 3 and try to catch up on season 4. It's been quite the ride lately.
The exact opposite of what's been happening on Galactica...
Posted by: JP on April 20, 2008 08:52 PMI think after the second season, the initial concept loses its novelty, but with the third season the creators were able to take the show in a different direction while still maintaining its mysticism and what they're doing with Season Four is some of their most creative work yet. Personally, I think it's the best show on television, but that's just me :) So, I encourage you and your wife to at least give Season Three a shot and if it's still not doing it for you, then at least you tried...
Posted by: Robert on April 21, 2008 01:12 AMJP - that's tjhe first logical reason so far. That fact is quite convincing. Now if I could just find the time...
Posted by: John on April 21, 2008 08:37 AMI remember Twin Peaks from back in the day. I kept saying to my husband, "Twin Peaks was all style and no substance." When Lost popped up, I enjoyed it at first but then I kept thinking..."uhm, it's going the way of Twin Peaks. This thing has no center."
Sure, I was all set to believe that it was really a story about folks stuck inside a video game. I was set to believe in anything. But then I realized an open-ended television show based on a mystery...had to remain mysterious and confusing as long as possible. If it had a time-limit, like a telenovela or a mini-series, the creators might have committed to making a story with substance, a beginning, a middle, an end, a true speculative fiction world. But they seemed to get into the game of "let's not let the viewers figure us out." And after awhile they forgot that a story isn't primarily about outwitting viewers and coming up with surprises...and they just got lost. -C
Posted by: Carole McDonnell on April 23, 2008 02:38 PMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://covblogs.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/12005
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Lost lost me: