July 24, 2007

Letter to a Christian Author

Dear Sir/Madam

The trouble with Christian fiction is, it proselytizes to the converted! I'm currently in the process of reading a Christian book, a book that will never make it to the mainstream, yet is written as if some non-Christian will actually pick it up and be converted by it.

The good Christian authors, like Francine Rivers or L. B. Graham, know they are preaching to the converted and so write books that affirm their beliefs or provide support and encouragement to the readers they know will read their books.

The bad Christian authors always want to use their books as missionary tools, to preach the gospel to those who have not heard it yet. But let's be honest, no non-Christian is ever going to pick up your book. And if they did, they would know it for the tract that it is, and lump it in with the hand method for sharing the gospel or the "magazines" of Jehovah's Witnesses. They then point to this as the reason so much Christian fiction is "bad" even when it is quite well-written.

It's a sad fact, but its true.

Other Christian authors a truly great. Flannery O'Connor and J.R.R. Tolkien wrote great stories. Madeleine L'Engle and George MacDonald did the same. Their world view allowed them to delve into what it means to be human, both in the darkness and in the light. They wrote stories of excellence trying to understand the world and its fallen nature, and avoided overt attempts to proselytize in their works.

And so they found success in the mainstream by not allowing themselves to have an agenda, but simply to sought to tell a story.

The same is true of secular fiction with overt agendas. The books may sell for a while, even top bestseller lists, but eventually is seen for what it is and discarded. (Unless, of course, the agenda is the destruction of Christianity, which will always be successful in a sin dominated world. i.e. The Da Vinci Code).

You might point to C. S. Lewis as proof of the opposite in the Narnia books, but I say that one can only attribute the books' success to the notoriety of its author worldwide at the volumes' time of publication.

So many other Christian authors simple churn out bad literature for the sake of trying to make a sale. And what they are selling is Christianity. Sorry folks, but Christian fiction ain't gonna convert nobody. It will be a support and help to the converted and the saved, might make interesting stories or raise interesting questions, but only relationships with unbelievers and the power of the Holy Spirit will convert anybody.

The great Christian authors knew this, so they did their very best to delve into the world, to understand how it ticks, much like the watchmaker knows the gears of the cuckoo clock. In doing so, they gave humanity insights into its own nature, perhaps engendering a look into their soul. And they did so without proselytizing (at least not obviously). They allow the story to do its own proselytizing, without the need to insert Scripture or references to God to ensure that the reader "gets" the Christian nature of the novel.

The great Christian author will let the story God has given him or her unfold. God will use the novel to work on hearts, I don't deny that, but it shouldn't be forced. God's seed will plant without overuse of Scripture or excessive allegory.

(You might point to Bunyan and Lewis as successes, but I don't. Their popularity continues because of successive generations of Christians buying and selling their books. Besides, the exception of the popularity of Narnia does not create the rule for all allegory.)

That does not mean we shouldn't try to write Christian novels. But we should be trying less to ensure that we insert Scripture and more to ensure that we are probing the human mind, the creation of God, and our relationships.

Yours Sincerely,

A Christian Reader

PS: Care to disagree? Leave a comment.

Posted by John on July 24, 2007 03:33 PM | Posted to Christian SF&F | General Fiction | Literature and Language | Religion
Share: Add to Digg Add to Del.icio.us Google Add to Ma.gnolia Add to StumbleUpon Add to Reddit Add to Spurl Add to Technorati
Comments

Terrific points, John!

I'd add Dorothy Sayers to your list, too. I remember reading somewhere--I think it might have been her own discussion--that she deliberately didn't convert her main character (Lord Peter Wimsey) because she thought it would be forced. At the same time, she would occasionally have him run into elements of a supernatural reality that he couldn't explain in his worldview.

Posted by: Joanna on July 24, 2007 04:00 PM

The Left Behind books rock!

Posted by: bill on July 24, 2007 04:55 PM

I'm of the opinion that an author's beliefs and opinions will leak into their writing, without desperate attempts at ingraining them.
I don't really understand why people set out to write "Christian books"--if they're believers, surely what they write should reflect this?

Posted by: John Dent on July 24, 2007 05:38 PM

Lord Peter quotes Scripture, but more as a literary reference than as a statement of faith (similar to how Steinbeck the atheist might use Scriptural phrases to title his books, i.e., East of Eden). But I suppose such a subtle use signifies that his worldview has absorbed certain truths from Scripture as givens.

And even though Lord Peter doesn't pray, go to church, preach, evangelize or otherwise demonstrate more overt signs of "religion," I felt that his relationship with Harriet exemplified real problems of how to serve, love, enjoy, protect, and otherwise care for another in a way decidedly informed by Christian values. While C.S. Lewis may have treated such concepts as Love in mini-treatises, Sayers demonstrated through her characters what she felt Christian love (of all sorts) was and wasn't.

Sayers also didn't compartmentalize her fiction: because she was a scholar, her books appeal to the scholar as well as to the Christian. Perhaps the Christian scholar is the one who gleans the most from her books, but that again demonstrates the multiple layers that are available in Sayers' books *because* she didn't just make them "Christian."

Sorry if this sounds nauseatingly laudatory, but I'm a huge fan of Sayers.

Posted by: funke on July 24, 2007 06:08 PM

As a non-Christian, I think you're dead-on. I would add that I think one of the major problems with Christian proselytizing novels is that few, if any, of their authors seem understand what atheists think and how they feel about Christianity.

C.S. Lewis is a prime example of this, although I never read his books as being an attempt to convert people to Christianity, but rather to inspire lasting and meaningful faith in nominally Christian children. And even if he was attempting to convert, he was attempting to convert children, which is a very different thing from converting adults.

Posted by: Poodlerat on July 25, 2007 12:15 PM

Poodlerat. You are probably more right than I was in your assessment of Lewis. Nonetheless I have heard conversion stories based on Narnia, who then jumped to Lewis' non-fiction and Christian apologetics.

Also, what is it that atheists think? I hear a lot of condemenation of Christians, but not many reasons or true feelings about Christianity other than hatred spawned from poor religious upbringing or a need for a whipping boy.

Maybe you could clarigy it in a post sometime?

Posted by: John on July 27, 2007 07:59 AM

John, I answered your question (or tried to) at my blog. I hope I managed to clarify what I said a bit, although feel free to ask more questions if I didn't.

Posted by: Poodlerat on July 27, 2007 08:10 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://covblogs.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/10507

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Letter to a Christian Author: